Patriot Alert Forums: Patriot Alert

Jump to content

Obama's War inside Pakistan: Exposed

User is offline  
Nick 
- Yesterday, 10:25 AM - 1 comments

Quote

THE discovery of three American soldiers among the dead in a suicide bombing at the opening of a girls’ school in the northwestern Pakistan town of Dir last week reignited the fears of many Pakistanis that Washington was set on invading their country.

Barack Obama has banned the Bush-era term “war on terror” and dithered about sending extra troops to Afghanistan, but across the border in Pakistan, the US president has dramatically stepped up the covert war against Islamic extremists.


Read more: http://www.timesonli...icle7017929.ece

I am fond of this comment in particular, posted by a reader:

Quote

Dell Miller wrote:
Nobel Peace Prize ?

Barry likes to blame everything on GWBush but then continues along exactly the same path.

"No Change"
:giggle:
Read 10 times - last comment by Mike   Icon   Icon

Sarkozy Goes Negative on Obama

User is offline  
Nick 
- Yesterday, 10:22 AM - 1 comments

Quote

French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who sought during the 2008 presidential campaign to associate himself with Barack Obama, has become sharply critical of the American president, often comparing Obama unfavorably to himself, according to an article published this week in the authoritative French daily Le Monde.

Read more: http://www.politico....ve.html?showall
Read 14 times - last comment by Mike   Icon   Icon

What about Sarah-cuda

User is offline  
Mike 
- Yesterday, 10:12 AM - 2 comments

After watching Sarah Palin's keynote speech at the National Tea Party Convention, I am left with even more doubts and questions about her.

She's sharp, she's attractive, she presses all the right hot-buttons and doesn't pull punches. Does she understand conservative Americans are wanting to hear about Republican policy and not witness Palin publicity?

She got a lot of applause from the attendees, but let's cut through all the rhetoric. What did she really have to say?

She showed she really has little understanding about the tea party movement. She failed to mention how the RINOs have expanded government at nearly every step. She failed to address the issues of making government smaller.

I think she is more than a little confused about how the tea party movement doesn't trust the RINOs any more than anyone else.

During her post-speech interview, an interesting question was posed to her, asking her what she felt needs to be done in America. Her reply was, 'we need to rein in spending'. I'm sure there's not a conservative alive that wouldn't agree with you, Governor Palin. However you failed to explain how we should go about doing just that.

To borrow a phrase from her speech, I'm tired of all the talk, talk, talk.

I just watched her on Chris Wallace and she seemed to be capable of firing off answers as quickly as Wallace was asking them. But once again, it was all talk, talk, talk.
Read 61 times - last comment by Mike   Icon   Icon

Spending Freeze Not Likely

User is offline  
Mike 
- 02-02-10 08:05 - 0 comments

Ron Paul, pointing out the fallacies of the alleged Washington spending freeze.




Full text -

Last week politicians in Washington made a few things clear about how they really feel about the state of the union. First, they are beginning to hear the growing discontent with the size and scope of government and the broken promises that keep piling up. Certain events in Massachusetts recently made that statement loud, clear and unavoidable. In the face of those events, the powers that be made the determination that some populist rhetoric was in order, and the idea of a spending freeze in Washington was proposed, albeit with several caveats. These caveats to the proposed spending freeze ensure that we are not at any real risk of actually doing anything about spending.

First of all is timing. It wouldn't go into effect until 2011, which allows plenty of time to increase spending levels quite a bit before they are frozen. If the administration really understood and cared about our spending problems they would not freeze spending a year from now, but cut spending immediately and significantly. But, spending cuts almost never happen in Washington, and they are not likely now or a year from now -- if the politicians have anything to say about it.

More...


Read 37 times - make a comment   Icon   Icon

Ron Paul for President 2012

User is offline  
Mike 
- 02-02-10 07:44 - 3 comments

Isn't time to elect politicians that want to uphold the Constitution of the United States and get rid of those who choose to spit and trample on it?


Read 49 times - last comment by Mike   Icon   Icon

Sarah Palin's take on the budget

User is offline  
VegasBruce 
- 02-01-10 20:43 - 0 comments

The Link


Are You Capable of Decency, Rahm Emanuel?
Share
Today at 7:32pm
The newly-released mind-boggling, record-smashing $3,400,000,000,000 federal budget invites plenty of opportunity to debate the merits of incurring more and more debt that will drown the next generation of Americans. Never has it been possible to spend your way out of debt. So... let the debate begin.

Included in the debate process will be opportunities for our president to deliberate internally the wisdom of this debt explosion, along with other economic, military and social issues facing our country. Our president will discuss these important issues with Democrat leaders and those within his inner circle. I would ask the president to show decency in this process by eliminating one member of that inner circle, Mr. Rahm Emanuel, and not allow Rahm’s continued indecent tactics to cloud efforts. Yes, Rahm is known for his caustic, crude references about those with whom he disagrees, but his recent tirade against participants in a strategy session was such a strong slap in many American faces that our president is doing himself a disservice by seeming to condone Rahm’s recent sick and offensive tactic.

The Obama Administration’s Chief of Staff scolded participants, calling them, “F---ing retarded,” according to several participants, as reported in the Wall Street Journal.

Just as we’d be appalled if any public figure of Rahm’s stature ever used the “N-word” or other such inappropriate language, Rahm’s slur on all God’s children with cognitive and developmental disabilities – and the people who love them – is unacceptable, and it’s heartbreaking.

A patriot in North Andover, Massachusetts, notified me of Rahm’s “retarded” slam. I join this gentleman, who is the father of a beautiful child born with Down Syndrome, in asking why the Special Olympics, National Down Syndrome Society and other groups condemning Rahm’s degrading scolding have been completely ignored by the White House. No comment from his boss, the president?

As my friend in North Andover says, “This isn’t about politics; it’s about decency. I am not speaking as a political figure but as a parent and as an everyday American wanting my child to grow up in a country free from mindless prejudice and discrimination, free from gratuitous insults of people who are ostensibly smart enough to know better... Have you no sense of decency, sir?”

Mr. President, you can do better, and our country deserves better.

- Sarah Palin
Read 35 times - make a comment   Icon   Icon

Danny Glover's Haiti Earthquake Theory

User is offline  
VegasBruce 
- 01-21-10 19:38 - 0 comments

Earthquake


The fact that Danny Glover is nuttier than elephant poop should surprise no one. But now, he's even topped himself, as the washed-up actor blames the Haiti earthquake on the response to the climate change conference.

Check it out, check-it-outers:

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

DANNY GLOVER, ACOTR/ACTIVIST: That means that other countries in the region — Venezuela, Brazil, Cuba and other countries have already accepted the point that this is a great moment for another type of internationalism, you know.

And I hope we seize this particular moment because the threat of what happens in Haiti is the threat that can happen anywhere in the Caribbean to these island nations, you know?

They're all in peril because of global warming; they're all in peril because of climate change. When we see what we did at the climate summit in Copenhagen, this is the response, this is what happens, you know what I'm saying?

But we have to act now.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

Nice.

Now this guy is supposed to be an expert, but instead of identifying the obvious — that areas rife with political corruption and resulting poverty often experience more devastation after a natural disaster — he blames it all on our nonplussed response to Copenhagen.

Clearly, global warming has infected his brain so severely, he cannot think straight. This could also explain why he did "Saw V."
Read 52 times - make a comment   Icon   Icon

Health Care Bill in deep trouble

User is offline  
Karen 
- 01-21-10 15:58 - 0 comments

http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=1169190480850&ref=nf
Read 61 times - make a comment   Icon   Icon

The Constitution as a Trust

User is offline  
TrustGuy 
- 01-20-10 14:52 - 1 comments

What we are dealing with at base is; what sort of document is this “Constitution” and what law was it constructed in harmony with ?

It was constructed in accordance with English Common Law. More specifically those laws established concerning Decent and Distribution The Statute of Uses, Statute Against Perpetuities, Statute on Trusts and others, ALL having to do with Estates and Inheritance matters.

What needed to be addressed is how the new Body Politic divided up the spoils of war. Among those spoils were well recognized “Rights” of Englishmen. From the basic Rights afforded every Free Englishman to the highest exclusive power of the Royal Family, it all needed to be distributed among the victors.

All these Rights were recognized as inheritable property. Personal Property Owned by the individual and passed on at death.

Problem, how to pass the Rights, Titles and Duties of an individual ( King ) on to a body politic. The answer is via Trust.

The Constitution established an Estate in trust for the “Posterity“. What is lost is Trustworthy Trustees of the Estate. The “elected” office holders are operating exclusively in their capacity of Office of Profit, having long forsaken their Office of Trust.

More to come.

http://www.The-Legacy.info
Read 67 times - last comment by TrustGuy   Icon   Icon

It's good to see someone telling the truth

User is offline  
Mike 
- 01-19-10 11:52 - 0 comments

When will the American public wake up enough to start holding this administration's feet to the fire over all the lies? When Brown claims his win in Massachusetts, we will have a rallying point. Don't let this excellent opportunity to galvanize this nation into action slip by!


Read 84 times - make a comment   Icon   Icon


Icon Online Users

0 members, 2 visitors and 0 anonymous users

Cuil



February 2010


Icon Latest Discussions